Key Takeaways
- In 2024, the Arkansas House of Representatives passed two bills aiming to curb crypto mining across the state.
- Residents argue crypto mining could put a strain on local infrastructure.
The Planning Commission of Vilonia, Arkansas, has unanimously rejected a proposal to establish a crypto mining facility within city limits, following weeks of vocal opposition from residents. The vote marks the latest instance of local resistance to the expansion of crypto-mining operations in small communities.
The commission’s decision came during a public meeting where residents cited concerns over the potential impact of such a facility on the town’s environment and quality of life. Most of the worries were tied to noise pollution from industrial-grade mining rigs, rising energy demands, and limited economic benefits to the local population.
Several community members referenced other U.S. towns that experienced increased electricity costs and constant mechanical noise following the introduction of similar operations. “We’re not interested in living next to a 24/7 industrial noise machine,” one resident reportedly said during the meeting. Another questioned the long-term value of allowing such energy-intensive operations with few permanent jobs created in return.
Vilonia has dealt with similar issues in the past. In 2023, the city’s planning commission revoked a permit granted to the company Vilo AR after public pressure, effectively blocking its attempt to build a mining facility. That same year, a separate proposal by Green Digital also faced rejection after residents raised alarms over its location near residential zones and alleged foreign ties.
Crypto mining, which involves using high-powered computer systems to validate blockchain transactions and generate digital currency, consumes large amounts of electricity.
In 2024, the Arkansas House of Representatives passed two bills aiming to curb crypto mining across the state. Earlier, in January, state legislators introduced Senate Bill 60, which proposed a ban on mining facilities operating within 30 miles of any U.S. military base. Though supported by Senate member Ricky Hill and House Speaker Brian Evans, the bill failed to advance after being rejected by the Senate’s City, County and Local Affairs Committee.
